WORD REIMAGINED The wire · 21 filed · live

Source archive Tier A

Louisiana v. Callais, 608 U.S. ___ (2026) — Slip Opinion

Louisiana v. Callais, No. 24-109, 608 U.S. ___ (2026) (slip op.).

Custody docket

Record
scotus-louisiana-v-callais-slip-opinion-2026
Type
archive
Trust tier
A
Status
published

Sources are graded A (primary) / B (secondary academic) / C (secondary journalism) / D (tertiary or contested). See the manifesto’s Evidence Standard for full criteria.

Decided April 29, 2026, 6–3. Majority opinion by Justice Alito, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Dissent by Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson. Holds that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act “imposes liability only when the circumstances give rise to a strong inference that intentional discrimination occurred” (slip op. 23) and that “the focus of §2 must be enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment’s prohibition on intentional racial discrimination” (slip op. 23–26). The Court found that Louisiana’s compliance with Section 2 did not justify the State’s use of race in drawing SB8 because the VRA, as reinterpreted, did not require an additional majority-minority district. Kagan dissent argues the majority “eviscerate[s]” Section 2 by reinstating the intent requirement Congress removed by statute in 1982.

Provenance

Creator
Supreme Court of the United States
Published
2026
Accessed
2026-05-13

Cited by

Theme custody

No theme record references this source.

On the wire