Sources / Receipts

This is how the site handles truth claims.

The audience should never have to guess what kind of claim they are reading.

History

Verifiable records

Primary or institutional evidence: court records, official histories, finding aids, archival scans, technical documents, and proximate reporting.

Myth

Symbolic or sacred narrative

Mythic texts, cosmological frameworks, storyworld canon, and symbolic meaning clearly identified as such.

Interpretation

Synthesis and argument

The studio's framing, cross-reading, and inference layer. This is where ideas get connected, not disguised as pure record.

How a strong piece should cite itself

Level 1 — Primary or official

Patents, court cases, official site histories, library records, oral-history archives, maps, and source documents.

Level 2 — Secondary support

Reliable scholarship, institutional biographies, synthesis essays, and responsible explainers.

Level 3 — Studio interpretation

The part where the project says what the record means, what the tension is, and why the story matters now.

Level 4 — Creative canon

Storyworld rules, symbolic echoes, and fictional translation layers that should be clearly marked when they appear.

Make the trust layer visible

Use pills, sidebars, accordions, footnotes, or source drawers. The audience should see how the piece is built while they read it.

LabelHistory / Myth / Interpretation
Receipt1 to 3 source anchors on the page
NoteWhy this source matters
BridgeHow the argument moves beyond the source